best historical novels and tales(杷追畢鶴櫛蟻煽雰弌傍絞並娼僉).-及2嫗
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
Historical by the introduction of dates�察 �personages�察 �or events�察 �to which
identification can be readily given。 I am quite aware that certain well´
known novels which give the general atmosphere of a periodsuch�察 �for
5
´ Page 6´
A Guide to the Best Historical Novels and Tales
example�察 �as Hawthorne's ;Scarlet Letter; and Mr。 Hewlett's ;Forest
Lovers;do not e within the scope of my definition�察�but this is just
why I have added a ;Supplementary List; of semi´historical tales。 And�察�
while I am alluding to this ;Supplementary List�察─�I should like to give my
reason for omitting from it one remarkable book which has every claim to
be considered representative of the mid´nineteenth century。 Readers of
;John Inglesant; may be reminded that in his interesting preface Mr。
Shorthouse alludes to William Smith's philosophical novel;Thorndale。;
As a picture of Thought developments in the early Victorian period�察 �the
latter work has special historical interest for the philosophical and
theological student�察�in this respect it may be likened to Pater's ;Marius the
Epicurean�察─�which vividly reproduces the Intellectual ferment of an earlier
age。 ;Thorndale�察─�however�察 �is primarily didactic�察 �and the philosophical
dialogues ��interesting as these are to the metaphysician�� hardly atone to
the general reader for an almost entire absence of plot。 The above is�察�
doubtless�察 �an altogether extreme instance�察 �but the exclusion of several
other works from the category of Romance seems to follow on something
like the same grounds。 Becker's ;Charicles; and ;Gallus; are little more
than school textbooks�察 �while�察 �turning to a less scholarly quarter�察�
Ainsworth's ;Preston Fight�察─ �and even his better´known ;Guy Fawkes�察─�
may be cited as illustrating what Mr。 Shorthouse means when he speaks of
novels ;in which a small amount of fiction has been introduced simply for
the purpose of relating History。; In all such cases the average novel´
reader feels that he has been allured on false pretences。 I am well aware
that not a few of the books included in my List might be considered to fall
under the same ban�察�but I think it will be found that in most of them there
is at least a fair attempt to arouse narrative interest。
ing to the List itself�察�it will be noticed that I have been somewhat
sparing in the books given under the ;Pre´Christian; heading。 Novels
dealing with these very far´off times are apt to be unsatisfactory�察�the mist
in which events and personages are enveloped�察 �takes away from that
appearance of reality which is the great charm of the historical novel。 We
are hardly concerned�察 �in reading ;Sarchedon; and similar books�察 �to get
away from the purely imaginary pictures which spring from the Novelist's
6
´ Page 7´
A Guide to the Best Historical Novels and Tales
own brain�察 �and the danger is that the very elements which add to our
interest in the tale as such�察�will go far to mislead us in our conception of
the period dealt with。 There is none of that sense of familiarity which we
enjoy when reading a sixteenth or seventeenth century romance�察 �in the
latter case�察�the historical background�察�being easily perceptible�察�merges for
us with the creations of the author's own imagination。 Where the writer
of an ;ancient; romance happens to be a scholar like Ebers�察�we feel that
so far at least as historical presentment goeswe cannot be far wrong�察�but
the bination of great scholarship and narrative capacity is�察 �alas�察 �too
rare� �
I have likewise refrained from giving many tales dealing with Early´
Christian times。 We are here�察 �it must be admitted�察 �on controversial
ground�察�and under the First Century heading I have endeavoured to insert
romances of the highest quality only。 For instance�察 �I think that Dr。
Abbott's ;Philochristus; and Wallace's ;Ben Hur; ought to satisfy two
different types of readers。 And this is the place�察�doubtless�察�to say that in
my lists will be found books of widely differing merit and aim。 School
teachers�察 �and others in like capacity�察 �will easily discriminate between
authors suitable for juvenile or untrained tastes�察�and authors whose appeal
is specially to those of maturer thought and experience。 Differing as
much in method and style as in choice of period and character type�察�
Thackeray's ;Vanity Fair; and George Eliot's ;Romola; have at least this
in monthey require a very high degree of intelligence for their due
appreciation。 Who�察 �among those of us with any knowledge of such
works�察 �would dream of remending them to a youthful reader fresh
from the perusal of Miss Yonge's ;Little Duke�察─ �or Captain Marryatt's
;Children of the New Forest;�拭�
Naturally in a list of this kind there is bound to be very great inequality�察�
certain periods have been wholly ignored by writers of the first rank�察�while
in others we have something like an embarras de richesse。 Consequently�察�
I have been pelled�察�here and there�察�to insert authors of only mediocre
merit。 In other cases�察�again�察�I have not hesitated to omit works by writers
of acknowledged position when these have seemed below the author's
usual standard�察�and where no gap had to be filled。 I would instance the
7
´ Page 8´
A Guide to the Best Historical Novels and Tales
James II。´ William III。 period。 Here Stanley Weyman and ;Edna Lyall;
might have been represented�察 �but�察 �there being no dearth of good novels
dealing with both the above reigns�察�I did not deem it advisable to call in
these popular writers at the point which has been very generally
considered their lowest。 I mention this to show that omissions do not
necessarily mean ignorance�察�though�察�in covering such an immense ground�察�
I cannot doubt that romances worthy of a place in my list have been
overlooked。
I think m